Youth literacy in the United States is in a state of crisis. In 2022, only 32% of fourth-grade public school students were proficient in reading, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress. It was worse for eighth-grade students, with just 29% performing at or above the proficient level.
These figures represent a decline from previous assessments, indicating that fewer students are developing the critical reading skills necessary for academic success and everyday functioning.
Several factors have contributed to the problem, such as socioeconomic disparities, limited access to preschool or early learning options, inadequate resources for schools in disadvantaged areas, inconsistent instructional methods or curriculum, and a lack of parental involvement in children’s reading development. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted education, with prolonged school closures and the shift to remote learning disrupting the traditional learning environment.
FETC 2025: How esports is building strong communities
The implications of low literacy rates among American youth are far-reaching. Being literate opens doors, fosters a sense of confidence, independence, and belonging. However, students who struggle to read are likely to encounter difficulties across all subjects, limiting their academic achievement and opportunity. If this trend continues, the future workforce and overall socio-economic health of the nation are at risk.
Regardless of how we arrived at this point, we have to stop diverting attention from the real problem. School leaders and lawmakers need to continue to advocate for high-quality early childhood education and adequate funding to ensure that schools—particularly in underserved communities—have the resources to support literacy.
Rationalizing, blaming the test or comparing schools or states to one another diminishes the urgency. It’s time to stop making excuses, to clearly define this as a crisis, and address youth literacy in a multifaceted and systemic approach.
Evaluating and adjusting
At the school-level, teachers need access to resources that enable them to effectively teach literacy skills. Michigan’s Literacy Essentials, which provides a framework and strategies to improve literacy skills, is an example of a resource that can ensure instructional practices are aligned with research about how students learn to read. Access to professional development opportunities, support from literacy specialists and access to assessment tools to monitor and address individual student progress are also essential.
Shared commitments among the teaching staff regarding the curriculum and methods are also necessary in order to ensure consistency and efficacy. When teachers collaborate and adhere to common goals, strategies and assessments, they create a consistent and supportive learning environment across grade levels and classrooms.
This alignment helps to identify and address individual student needs more effectively, as teachers can share insights and resources, ensuring that no student falls through the cracks. Moreover, this “deprivatizing” of practice promotes professional growth among educators, as they learn from each other’s experiences and expertise, ultimately leading to improved teaching practices and better student outcomes.
Additionally, regular and meaningful progress monitoring must be in place in order to systematically track students’ reading development and tailor instruction to meet individual needs. Regular assessment provides data-driven insights into each student’s progress, enabling timely interventions that can prevent minor difficulties from becoming significant obstacles.
By continuously evaluating and adjusting instructional strategies based on accurate and current information, educators can foster an inclusive learning environment where all students, regardless of their starting point, have the opportunity to achieve reading proficiency.
Empowering principals in youth literacy
Lastly, we must embrace the critical role of the principal. This is not intended to diminish the role of the classroom teacher or staff who provide individualized support and interventions—each of those roles are also important. But in addition to empowering staff, visiting classrooms and providing support, the principal alone holds the authority to define and monitor indicators of effective instruction, ensuring consistency and alignment through clear “look fors” and agreed upon best instructional practices.
Moreover, as the sole spokesperson for the instructional program, it is the principal who has the opportunity to communicate the urgency of the problem, to call in all voices, nurture collaboration to align efforts, and build collective efficacy necessary to solve the problem.
With large percentages of students lacking proficiency in reading, the stakes are high and our behaviors and mindsets about literacy have to shift from traditional practices to a more unified, systemic approach. By providing teachers with essential resources, fostering shared commitments, being intentional about progress monitoring and empowering principals as instructional leaders, we can create the conditions necessary for every child to succeed.
