Should schools be allowed funding for surveillance technology?

Date:

Share post:

When K12 schools bolster security by installing additional safety technology hardware, they’re allowing for a “dangerous new chapter in the school-to-prison pipeline and mass criminalization of Black, Brown and Indigenous youth and other marginalized young people.”

That’s according to a letter authored by a coalition of more than 40 civil rights organizations directed to the U.S. Department of Education. Its message? To ban K12 schools from leveraging federal funding to purchase surveillance equipment, including those that utilize artificial intelligence.

“We are alarmed by the growing use of surveillance technologies to expand police presence in schools and expose students to greater police contact, exclusionary discipline, and school pushout,” the letter reads.


More from DA: College vs. workforce prep: At which are schools more successful?


Above all, the authors urge the agency to embrace the following six recommendations as holistic strategies to protect marginalized communities from “technology-enabled rights abuses,” including:

  • Banning the use of federal funds for surveillance technologies.
  • Divesting discretionary agency appropriations from funding police surveillance hardware.
  • Provide technical guidance and assistance to support school districts in conducting algorithmic impact audits to determine the legal compliance of AI and big data technologies.
  • Study surveillance tools and other algorithmic technologies for the risks and other concerns they pose to public schools.
  • Center leadership and vision of youth and young adults alongside marginalized groups and community-based organizations in AI data privacy governance.

A number of states have outlined how legislators can author change to put an end to surveillance misuse in public schools. New York, for instance, announced last year a statewide ban on using facial recognition technology in its schools. The letter argues there’s more work to be done.

“Students, families, educators, advocates, and lawmakers have continuously raised concerns about the pervasive use of school surveillance technologies, including student device monitoring technologies,” the authors wrote. “We joining their voices in urging the Department to take immediate action to end this dangerous transformation of America’s public schools.”

Micah Ward
Micah Wardhttps://districtadministration.com
Micah Ward is the editor at District Administration. For more than four years, he's covered artificial intelligence, edtech and district leadership. He holds a master's degree in Journalism from the University of Alabama. Find Micah Ward on LinkedIn or email him at [email protected].

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles