Leaders devote a great deal of time toward creating their district’s strategic plans, yet their direct impact on student performance remains inconclusive, new research confirms.
In an analysis of 100 school districts (one urban and one rural per state) and their strategic plans, the District Administration Leadership Institute identified baseline trends in district strategic plans over time. The findings also encourage ongoing research to refine strategic planning processes and improve outcomes for students.
Now in its second year, the inaugural report sought to expand on the 2024 report while focusing on new aspects of school districts’ plans, such as:
- Demographic and geographic differences and similarities
- District efforts to refine post-pandemic strategies in response to emerging research and policy shifts
- Direct links between strategic plans and student performance, measuring which strategies have yielded tangible improvements in outcomes
Here are some of the key findings from the research:
- Urban versus rural variations: Urban districts report more emphasis on instruction, while rural districts focus more on culture, systems and people.
- Geographic variations: Western states report fewer references to instructional priorities compared to their Midwestern and Eastern counterparts.
- Strategic plans and student performance: No significant relationships were found between the components of strategic plans and student performance in ELA or mathematics.
“The findings suggest that while strategic planning is prevalent, its direct impact on student performance remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for effective implementation and continuous evaluation,” the report reads.
While gaps persist in leadership and planning, the researchers offer several reasons why leaders are missing the mark.
First, districts may not be collecting the right data. Many strategic plans reference broad goals like “improving instructional quality” or “enhancing student engagement,” but lack measurable indicators to track progress.
Leaders must shift from a compliance-based approach to a performance-driven model, where implementation fidelity, real-time data tracking and teacher/principal capacity-building are prioritized.
Secondly, there’s a disconnect between planning and classroom practice. Moving forward, districts must reimagine how they structure, implement and evaluate their plans to ensure that these documents serve as living, actionable tools rather than symbolic statements of intent.
DOWNLOAD THE “NAVIGATING TOMORROW” REPORT
More from DA: How to support students’ well-being in the age of AI
