ESSER drop: New calculations aim to measure the fiscal cliff

Date:

Share post:

Superintendents may need to add the phrase “ESSER exposure” to their list of things not to look forward to as the COVID relief expiration date approaches. To help calm—or perhaps exacerbate—the concern, a leading K12 data-tracking organization is offering its calculations of the size of the fiscal cliff that public schools are facing.

ESSER exposure” is the term researchers at Burbio use to measure the percentage of ESSER III funding in an individual district’s spending plan. That should give administrators an idea of the hole the fiscal cliff will make in district budgets around the country.

Understanding ESSER exposure

Now we are going to throw a bunch of Burbio’s numbers at you. The new analysis covers about 2,500 districts representing over 90% of K12 students and the company estimates districts will spend 40% of all ESSER III funding in the 2023-24 school year.

A little more than 60% of districts are looking at an ESSER exposure level of less than 5% while about 8% of school systems are facing shortfalls of more than 10%. At the top of Burbio’s scale, a slim 0.1% of districts face exposure of 23%—nearly a quarter of their budgets.


New teaching roles: 6 innovations that may save the profession


The analysis also gauges the number of students affected, finding that just under half (48%) of K12 students attend districts with ESSER exposure of 5% or higher. “While many large districts have a high percentage of students who qualify as economically disadvantaged and thus a higher ESSER III allocation and more ESSER exposure, so do many low-enrollment rural districts and low-enrollment urban charter districts,” the researchers concluded.

A few state breakdowns

Burbio also drilled down to ESSER exposure levels among districts in a handful of states. Here’s what researchers found:

  • New Jersey: 93% of districts have ESSER III exposure of less than 5%; 6.6% of districts have exposure of over 5%.
  • Pennsylvania: 62% of districts have exposure of 5% or less; 23% have exposure of 5% to 10%; just over 11% have exposure of 10 to 15%, and 3.1% have exposure of over 15%.
  • Texas: 42% of districts have exposure of 5% or less; 42% have exposure of 5% to 10%; just over 11% have exposure of 10 to 15%, and 2.5% have exposure of over 15%.
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of District Administration, covering K-12 public school leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles