Are private school vouchers harmful to public K12?

Date:

Share post:

In eight states, at least $4 billion in taxpayer money was used to fund universal private school choice programs in 2023-24, impacting some 569,000 students. Here’s what that means for public schools.

The shift from public to private schools has been smaller than anticipated, new research from FutureEd suggests. In Iowa, one of the eight states utilizing private school choice programs outlined in the report, lawmakers projected more than one-third of its expected 14,000 ESA (Education Savings Account) participants would come from public schools. In reality, less than half transferred.

However, several states underestimated the sheer cost of these programs, with expenditures exceeding initial projections as a result of high participation, particularly from families who already pay for private school. Similarly, these programs primarily benefit students who are already enrolled in private schools.

“Enrollment continues to increase where programs are offered; several additional states have legislative proposals in the works; and advocacy organizations continue to push aggressively for expansion,” FutureEd Director Thomas Toch said in a statement.


More from DA: 6 strategies for addressing anonymous threats


The report also raises some concerns regarding the lack of transparency behind some programs. Many states don’t require standardized testing or public reporting of student performance data.

Instead, the research calls upon policymakers to consider several adjustments to their ESA programs:

  1. Better design: Communicate how these programs are defined, like whether funding is based on income.
  2. Equity: Policymakers ought to assess the equity of these programs and how they serve diverse student populations.
  3. Return on investment: Are taxpayer dollars being used efficiently to maximize student outcomes?

“How state leaders design these programs will have a powerful effect on which students participate in them, whether students benefit from the programs, the nature of the benefits, and the consequences for state budgets,” the researchers wrote.

Take a look at the full report here.

Micah Ward
Micah Wardhttps://districtadministration.com
Micah Ward is the editor at District Administration. For more than four years, he's covered artificial intelligence, edtech and district leadership. He holds a master's degree in Journalism from the University of Alabama. Find Micah Ward on LinkedIn or email him at [email protected].

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles