Four important steps

The more defensible path, both administratively and instructionally, is a managed-access approach rooted in technology use that enhances teaching and learning. Developing this approach requires a few concrete steps:

An instructionally grounded approach begins with conversations among teachers, curriculum leaders, instructional technology teams, and school administrators around the most effective ways to use technology to support learners and enhance the teaching and learning process for all students.
From there, you can begin to build a governance plan around appropriate uses of technology and deploy tools that give administrators visibility into how devices are being used in classrooms and throughout the school campus.
Deploying systems that provide both district- and classroom-level controls allows educators and administrators to create context-specific uses of technology. For example: technology use during instructional time can look different from technology use during lunch, or technology use in younger grades can look different from technology use in high school.
Usage data that actually informs decisions is equally important. Administrators can’t manage what they can’t see, and understanding which applications students are using, for how long, and in what contexts gives district leaders the evidence they need to make sound policy decisions and defend those decisions to boards and parents. It also surfaces straightforward wins: tools that aren’t being used at all and can simply be turned off.

Making strategy visible

Does good intent mean good policy? When legislators drafted these screen time laws, they were responding to legitimate concerns: seemingly disengaged students, sluggish academic growth, the encroachment of entertainment-oriented platforms into the school day, concerns over social media, and the risks of certain AI chatbots.

Instant Insights /

How to debate screen time without abandoning edtech

Related Stories

Recommended For You