How schools return to accountability post-COVID

Date:

Share post:

Grades and attendance are among the key accountability and assessment methods likely to return this school year, even in districts continuing with remote learning,  the testing nonprofit, NWEA, says.

In interviews with 22 leaders from a variety of districts, administrators said it would be critical to make learning expectations clear to students and their parents, according to”Education in the time of COVID-19: From crisis learning to a new normal.”

First, students and parents must understand what counts as attending class and how grades will be determined during remote and online learning, the leaders surveyed said.

At least one district has standards for how and when parents will receive communications from educators while other administrators have sought set limits on when teachers can contact students.


More from DA: 7 policy moves that could transform K-12 education


These district leaders also said it was important to measure learning loss that occurred during the spring COVID closures through they lacked the end-of-year assessment data they would’ve gathered in a normal year.

Leaders reopening with in-person instruction also said they worried schools might have to close again and were therefore working quickly to administer assessments.

“Their goal was to get good information on each students’ learning needs as early as they could to inform the instructional plans for each student,” the report says.

These leaders were concerned that students taking assessments remotely could be disrupted by family interference and technical problems.

They also worried data from remote testing wouldn’t be comparable to data from on-site assessments.

“Except for a couple of exceptions, all the district leaders shared their preference for administering the assessment on-site if possible but a willingness to administer assessments remotely if necessary,” the report says. “One district used test scores for high stakes decisions and therefore was understandably not open to anything but a highly secured, on-site testing environment.


More from DA: 6 reasons you should measure ‘skip-year’ growth in 2021


DA’s coronavirus page offers complete coverage of the impacts on K-12.

Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of District Administration, covering K-12 public school leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles