Schools suddenly lose $1 billion for mental health care

Date:

Share post:

DEI appears to be the reason the Trump administration is slashing $1 billion in school mental health grants that were created after the Uvalde mass shooting, according to multiple reports.

The grants, which will be discontinued at the end of the year, were part of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, passed in 2022. The Education Department targeted programs that train counselors and therapists to identify systemic racism and race-related trauma, USA Today reported. 

“We owe it to American families to ensure that taxpayer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students’ mental health,” Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said in a statement to USA Today.


Sal Khan Q&A: How to navigate AI with Trump’s order 


According to The Associated Press, the Education Department may create another source of funding for school mental health. The agency told Congress that the administration will “re-envision and re-compete its mental health program funds to more effectively support students’ behavioral health needs.”

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten warned the move will lead to more school shootings. She noted schools had hired thousands of psychologists, mental health workers and counselors with the Uvalde-era funding.

“This is a direct attack on the safety and well-being of America’s children—a repugnant act of moral vandalism that will endanger millions of lives,” Weingarten said. “Parents, students and educators want safe and welcoming schools, but instead, gun violence remains, shockingly, the No. 1 killer of young people.”

The Trump administration has been trying to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs from K12 and higher education—from curricula to after-school activities to operations. The Education Department had threatened to withhold federal funding if schools didn’t end their initiatives by April 24.

About a dozen states announced their schools would not comply with the directive. Last week, multiple judges blocked the administration, ruling its actions constituted unlawful censorship and violated schools’ First Amendment free speech protections.

 

Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of District Administration, covering K-12 public school leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles