Here’s a better way to measure a school’s performance

Date:

Share post:

Standardized tests are outdated as the primary metric for assessing school performance. Instead, a more comprehensive measurement adds four other factors to test scores.

Many superintendents care deeply about providing sufficient resources, establishing instructional priorities and monitoring student progress. While each goal is important, some of the most high-performing schools focus heavily on promoting a positive climate, empowering strong leadership and setting high expectations for rigorous instruction.

That’s according to new research from FutureEd, an independent, solution-oriented think tank at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy. The researchers suggest that while every educational institution aims to give students a strong academic experience, national student achievement levels continue declining. This has prompted experts to question whether traditional measures of achievement data are the best way to assess school performance.

Standardized test scores would, of course, be included in any overall performance assessment but would be one of several factors in a balanced system that fully captures student outcomes and the contributors to student success, the research claims.

A new school performance measurement model would prioritize the following five metrics:

1. Access to advanced coursework

The long-standing concentration of white and Asian students in advanced programs resulted in a movement to dismantle gifted and talented programs, exam schools, and other advanced opportunities, FutureEd suggests. It argues that these opportunities promote racial and economic segregation in public education.

Leaders and their teams should work to eliminate the “scarcity mentality” in advanced education that forces students to compete for far too few seats.

The research recommends that districts adopt strategies to ensure courses are staffed with teachers equipped to promote skill-building and a sense of belonging among a more diverse student body.

2. Access to high-capacity teachers and school leaders

Other bodies of research consistently identify teacher and principal quality as the most important school-based drivers of academic achievement. Teacher surveys and analyses of how much principals contribute to their schools’ achievement growth can provide meaningful measures of a school’s leadership quality.

Additionally, studies have shown that student test scores are higher in schools where teachers rate principal instructional leadership highly.


More from DA: Are tariffs impacting schools? Not as much as labor costs


3. How school climate and culture relate to student success

Several states rely on chronic absenteeism rates as a proxy for student engagement and a school’s ability to ensure a positive climate and culture. However, absenteeism is a complex issue that has many causes.

Instead, measuring school climate and culture should rely on well-implemented surveys of students, parents and educators. The results can also be used to identify areas of improvement.

4. Measures of student success after high school

The researchers suggest that high school test scores cannot adequately measure whether a school is preparing students for adulthood. Additional measures—such as whether graduates enroll in college, an apprenticeship or the armed services, and whether they complete those programs—are needed.

“We often evaluate a school based on what happens in that school,” Researcher David Yaeger was quoted in the report. “But the real measure is what happens in your life after you leave that school. That’s a better way to evaluate schools.”

5. Standardized test scores 

Test scores can drive high standards and rigorous instruction by telling students what they should know and be able to achieve. However, research shows that scores have played an outsized role in performance measurement.

“There’s so much about schools and what students are learning and experiencing in school that cannot be captured on a standardized test,” Elaine Allensworth of the University of Chicago consortium said in the report.

Altogether, these five metrics of school performance provide a richer, more complete picture of a school’s quality, the researchers confirm. Read the full report here.

Micah Ward
Micah Wardhttps://districtadministration.com
Micah Ward is the editor at District Administration. For more than four years, he's covered artificial intelligence, edtech and district leadership. He holds a master's degree in Journalism from the University of Alabama. Find Micah Ward on LinkedIn or email him at [email protected].

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively for K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles